From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id d1d55343 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2018 23:36:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 9EEF0A1831; Sun, 24 Jun 2018 09:36:18 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84739EE0C; Sun, 24 Jun 2018 09:36:09 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 734D99EE0C; Sun, 24 Jun 2018 09:36:07 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mcvoy.com (mcvoy.com [192.169.23.250]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3302F9EDE9 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2018 09:36:07 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mcvoy.com (Postfix, from userid 3546) id 4FD8235E133; Sat, 23 Jun 2018 16:36:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 16:36:06 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: Grant Taylor Message-ID: <20180623233606.GH24200@mcvoy.com> References: <20180622145402.GT21272@mcvoy.com> <20180622151751.BEK9i%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <20180622192505.mfig_%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <89e5ae21-ccc0-5c84-837b-120a1a7d9e26@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> <20180623144959.M9byU%steffen@sdaoden.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Subject: Re: [TUHS] off-topic list X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 05:31:06PM -0600, Grant Taylor via TUHS wrote: > On 06/23/2018 03:21 PM, Michael Parson wrote: > >The first rule in my .procmailrc does this with formail: > > That works well for many. But it does not work at all for me. > > There are many additional factors that I have to consider: > > - I use different email addresses for different things. I think you misunderstood what formail is doing. It's looking at the Message-ID header. The one for the email you sent looks like: Message-ID: All formail is doing is keeping a recent cache of those ids and only letting one get through. So suppose someone reply-alls to you and the list (very common). Without the formail trick you'll see that message twice.