From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.1
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 6f198f25
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>;
	Thu, 28 Jun 2018 17:10:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112)
	id 9995EA181D; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 03:10:12 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769A5A1816;
	Fri, 29 Jun 2018 03:10:00 +1000 (AEST)
Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112)
 id C788EA1816; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 03:09:56 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from mcvoy.com (mcvoy.com [192.169.23.250])
 by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FE9C9EDF1
 for <tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 03:09:56 +1000 (AEST)
Received: by mcvoy.com (Postfix, from userid 3546)
 id CC1B335E12C; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:09:55 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:09:55 -0700
From: Larry McVoy <lm@mcvoy.com>
To: Tim Bradshaw <tfb@tfeb.org>
Message-ID: <20180628170955.GH21688@mcvoy.com>
References: <af780f9fb5c14e37f12ce5c2a4e40376669c730f@webmail.yaccman.com>
 <81277CC3-3C4A-49B8-8720-CFAD22BB28F8@bitblocks.com>
 <20180628141538.GB663@thunk.org> <20180628144017.GB21688@mcvoy.com>
 <20180628105538.65f82615@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com>
 <20180628145825.GE21688@mcvoy.com>
 <2B710879-7659-47A4-AA86-03F232F7B78B@tfeb.org>
 <20180628160202.GF21688@mcvoy.com>
 <79022674-0FFA-4B1B-8A27-4C403D51540E@tfeb.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <79022674-0FFA-4B1B-8A27-4C403D51540E@tfeb.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Subject: Re: [TUHS] PDP-11 legacy, C, and modern architectures
X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list <tuhs.minnie.tuhs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tuhs>,
 <mailto:tuhs-request@minnie.tuhs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/>
List-Post: <mailto:tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tuhs-request@minnie.tuhs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tuhs>,
 <mailto:tuhs-request@minnie.tuhs.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org
Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org
Sender: "TUHS" <tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org>

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 05:41:24PM +0100, Tim Bradshaw wrote:
> On 28 Jun 2018, at 17:02, Larry McVoy <lm@mcvoy.com> wrote:
> > But when you are doing real work, sorting
> > the genome, machine learning, whatever, performance is a thing and
> > lots of wimpy cpus are not.
> 
> But lots of (relatively) wimpy CPUs is what physics says you will have
> and you really can't argue with physics.

I'm not sure how people keep missing the original point.  Which was:
the market won't choose a bunch of wimpy cpus when it can get faster
ones.  It wasn't about the physics (which I'm not arguing with), it 
was about a choice between lots of wimpy cpus and a smaller number of
fast cpus.  The market wants the latter, as Ted said, Sun bet heavily
on the former and is no more.

If you want to bet on what Sun did, feel free, but do so knowing that
people have tried to tell you that is a failed approach.