From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.1
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id e28549f9
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>;
	Tue, 7 Aug 2018 07:57:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112)
	id 1830EA1A11; Tue,  7 Aug 2018 17:57:45 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27F0A19CD;
	Tue,  7 Aug 2018 17:57:34 +1000 (AEST)
Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112)
 id 5CB52A19CC; Tue,  7 Aug 2018 17:57:34 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from mail.bitblocks.com (ns1.bitblocks.com [173.228.5.8])
 by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BAA1A19CD
 for <tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>; Tue,  7 Aug 2018 17:57:33 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from bitblocks.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.bitblocks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C379E156E408;
 Tue,  7 Aug 2018 00:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>
To: Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:31:36 -0700."
 <20180807073136.GA37082@wopr>
References: <1533588813.1868321.1465431536.01CE36BC@webmail.messagingengine.com>
 <20180807073136.GA37082@wopr>
Comments: In-reply-to Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net>
 message dated "Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:31:36 -0700."
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <33066.1533628631.1@bitblocks.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:57:11 -0700
Message-Id: <20180807075718.C379E156E408@mail.bitblocks.com>
Subject: Re: [TUHS] Origins of shell prompt suffixes % $ > #
X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list <tuhs.minnie.tuhs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tuhs>,
 <mailto:tuhs-request@minnie.tuhs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/>
List-Post: <mailto:tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tuhs-request@minnie.tuhs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tuhs>,
 <mailto:tuhs-request@minnie.tuhs.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org
Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org
Sender: "TUHS" <tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org>

On Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:31:36 -0700 Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 09:53:33PM +0100, Brian Zick wrote:
> >
> > rc uses ;
>        
> Does it?  10th edition Unix and Plan 9 rc both have ('% ' ' ') as the   
> default value of $prompt.  At least that's how it's described in the
> manual.  None of the v8/9/10 tarballs in the archive contain rc code,
> but some contain manual source, and those describe % prompts.
>
> I've seen other references to ; (presumably  ('; ' ' ')) as the rc 
> prompt but I've never seen it in the wild.  Does anyone here know what 
> the story is?

The es shell (by Haar and Rakitzis) used ; - the reason (as
per the man page)is that a user can cut-n-paste a previous
line to rexecute it (for the same reason people use term% and
cpu% functions to execute their args).  Es syntax was derived
from rc, which may be why the confusion.