From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id e0220677 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 14:40:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 0F2EBA1ED8; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:40:53 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A351A1A27; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:40:42 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 09AFFA1A27; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:40:39 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mcvoy.com (mcvoy.com [192.169.23.250]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 252E0A1A20 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:40:38 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mcvoy.com (Postfix, from userid 3546) id 9D95D35E104; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 07:40:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 07:40:37 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: arnold@skeeve.com Message-ID: <20180829144037.GO317@mcvoy.com> References: <20180828003057.GA317@mcvoy.com> <201808280601.w7S61oLM030628@freefriends.org> <20180829004627.GG317@mcvoy.com> <201808290529.w7T5TFKa006049@freefriends.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201808290529.w7T5TFKa006049@freefriends.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Subject: Re: [TUHS] SunOS code? X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" Sun never open sourced it. On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 11:29:15PM -0600, arnold@skeeve.com wrote: > Changed the subject line. > > Larry McVoy wrote: > > > So I'd go with MacOS is not a fun kernel. It's pretty close to BSD > > and I recently wandered through that VM system and I was not impressed. > > I wish like hell that Sun had fed their VM back to BSD. Yeah, it wasn't > > multi processor friendly but someone would have fixed that. > > > > The penguin stuff, it's OK. Not as clean as SunOS by a long shot. > > So, is the SunOS code available in a way that would let people hack > on it? They had ported it to 386 (roadrunner?), so maybe it'd be > possible to revive it and bring it into the 21st century. > > Just a thought, > > Arnold -- --- Larry McVoy lm at mcvoy.com http://www.mcvoy.com/lm