From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 9ad65fe4 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 19:41:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 13451A1A45; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 05:41:29 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE70A1A2F; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 05:41:10 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id F26FDA1A2C; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 05:41:07 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9DA6A1A25 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 05:41:07 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id 9E57818C0A2; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 15:41:06 -0400 (EDT) To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org Message-Id: <20180830194106.9E57818C0A2@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 15:41:06 -0400 (EDT) From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Subject: Re: [TUHS] SunOS code? X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" > From: Clem Cole > The problem is finding some at Oracle that would care Well, I've got a nephew who's been at Oracle for like 20+ years; he can probably point us at the right person. > and finding a proper distribution tape to officially release. Why do we need that? Can't they say 'any and all versions of SunOS', and that term ('SunOS') is sufficiently well defined in real-world documents (e.g. Sun licenses) that that should be 'good enough'. It sounds like the _actual code_ is reasonably available, we wouldn't need Oracle to go looking around for it, would we? Noel