From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 8aa90469 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 20:43:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 241BDA1A73; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 06:43:41 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA56A1A25; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 06:43:34 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 47DE4A1A25; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 06:43:33 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mcvoy.com (mcvoy.com [192.169.23.250]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1393A1A1A for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 06:43:32 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mcvoy.com (Postfix, from userid 3546) id BAA0D35E12C; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 13:43:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 13:43:32 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: Clem Cole Message-ID: <20180830204332.GG664@mcvoy.com> References: <20180830194106.9E57818C0A2@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <20180830202200.GC664@mcvoy.com> <20180830203621.GE664@mcvoy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Subject: Re: [TUHS] SunOS code? X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: TUHS main list , Noel Chiappa Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 04:40:49PM -0400, Clem Cole wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 4:36 PM Larry McVoy wrote: > > > > > As Rob Gingell once said "Bits rot. Unmaintained source quickly becomes > > worthless". > > > Yep. So the question goes back to what is SunOS 4.x.y. You seem to be > thinking in terms of looking at the kernel from those days (which is a fine > definition), but others said - hey I want to run this on my X or Y system. > That's a different definition I think. I suspect that if SunOS got any traction it would be the kernel plus maybe their shared libs and the Linux user space. And it would need to be ported to x86_64.