From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id bf94b509 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 21:34:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 0F81FA1A6D; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 07:34:20 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663C7A1A25; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 07:34:10 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 89EDAA1A25; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 07:34:08 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43BA4A1A1A for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 07:34:08 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id 6DC4718C0A6; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 17:34:07 -0400 (EDT) To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org Message-Id: <20180830213407.6DC4718C0A6@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 17:34:07 -0400 (EDT) From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Subject: Re: [TUHS] SunOS code? X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" > From: Warner Losh > The trouble, as I was given to understand when I worked at Solbourne, > was that ... There were a number of third party bits and pieces in there > that could not be relicensed ... if there are other IP issues, not > limited ... It's that quagmire that efforts like this will run up > against. Oh, we'll just ask Oracle for a license 'for all parts of SunOS for which they have the ability to grant a licence'. There's no way I'd want them to have to chase down all the corner cases, that's just a way to guarantee it will never happen. I'd want to ask for the bare minimum of time/effort on their part. Anything above that, probably the SCCS stuff would be next on the priority list, sounds like. Noel