From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FROM_EXCESS_BASE64,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 52bb6578 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 22:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id D3441A1F8B; Sat, 1 Sep 2018 08:20:27 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42ECA1A20; Sat, 1 Sep 2018 08:20:17 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=bitmessage.ch header.i=@bitmessage.ch header.b=iFHcRFIV; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id CA309A1A20; Sat, 1 Sep 2018 08:20:14 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail.bitmessage.ch (mail.bitmessage.ch [146.228.112.252]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DD93A1A1A for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2018 08:20:12 +1000 (AEST) dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=bitmessage.ch; s=mail; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:References; bh=AGnEyns+my9eYPwM37xfDITGEDejI8O3frFpVLz8sWk=; b=iFHcRFIV92ap2KLJk1yBdytfRfVzqshddm4QCTCYb0Wj/vAXS+R2tA+BNDw9zsEcpzIVcKBv6BZQ65bilwBiDt2LWG9/q0pmH8XFrrRqDn/kjyfXI5aVa5iuvo6caP91fvJ6cjFzdWMvzixLTSm2G4x4Txi4RfQvkcAYGiGsGtI= Received: from syrtis (BITMESSAGE [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bitmessage.ch with ESMTPSA (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256) ; Sat, 1 Sep 2018 00:19:01 +0200 Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:19:27 -0500 From: =?utf-8?B?Q8OhZw==?= To: TUHS main list Message-ID: <20180831221927.zeKvq%ca6c@bitmessage.ch> In-Reply-To: <20180831215854.GB28971@mcvoy.com> References: <20180830213407.6DC4718C0A6@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <20180831213451.r7LAj%ca6c@bitmessage.ch> <20180831215854.GB28971@mcvoy.com> User-Agent: s-nail v14.9.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [TUHS] SunOS code? X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" Larry McVoy wrote: > SunOS was based on the BSD code, the entire system was frequently > described as "a bug fixed BSD". > Solaris was Sys Vr4 [...]. Both the kernel and user space went to a > Sys V compat system, it no longer felt anything like BSD. =20 I find it kinda weird, considering what Bill Joy did for BSD and, obviously, for Sun. I wonder what he himself thinks about it. Shout out to Bill if he reads the list. Also, I'm using the original vi (ex-vi that is from Heirloom), not nvi, as my development platform. Another weird thing: his original vi never made it to any BSD distribution. -- ca=C3=B3c