From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 40fc231d for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2018 18:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 2FE75A2046; Sun, 2 Sep 2018 04:51:07 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC13CA1A6D; Sun, 2 Sep 2018 04:50:58 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 1C315A1A6D; Sun, 2 Sep 2018 04:50:55 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mcvoy.com (mcvoy.com [192.169.23.250]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 307EFA1A20 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2018 04:50:54 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mcvoy.com (Postfix, from userid 3546) id C5FBE35E145; Sat, 1 Sep 2018 11:50:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2018 11:50:53 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: TUHS main list Message-ID: <20180901185053.GA20993@mcvoy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Subject: [TUHS] UVM VM system X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" So I just read this https://www.usenix.org/legacy/event/usenix99/full_papers/cranor/cranor.pdf and it looks encouraging. Apparently NetBSD is using it. Does anyone know if they are happy with it? Has FreeBSD considered this? Has anyone benchmarked FreeBSD against NetBSD to see which is faster for VM stuff?