From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id ba27a0dd for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 17:58:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id A4960A1C8F; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 03:58:31 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1008AA1B19; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 03:58:10 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id E178FA1A95; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 03:58:05 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4F7EA1A8E for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 03:58:04 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id 06F7418C0CE; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 13:58:04 -0400 (EDT) To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org Message-Id: <20180904175804.06F7418C0CE@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 13:58:04 -0400 (EDT) From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Subject: Re: [TUHS] SunOS code? X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" > From: Henry Bent > just because you can find source (or binaries, or CD images, etc.) on > the internet, that doesn't make it the least bit legal. ... The concept > of "abandonware" has no legal footing whatsoever. True; but if all the copies of a particular item are discarded, one can make all the lawyers on the planet as happy as clams, and it won't do a bit of good. Save the bits, _then_ work out the legal issues, is my thinking on priorities. Noel (PS: 'Internet' is spelled with a capital; there are many internets, but only one Internet, just as there are many white houses, but only one White House. If the technical community, which _does_ understand the difference, can't get it's act together, how can we expect the media, etc, to do the right thing?)