From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.2
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 25abc040
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>;
	Tue, 25 Sep 2018 18:42:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112)
	id 00AE0A1DF7; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 04:42:06 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCBDF9E99B;
	Wed, 26 Sep 2018 04:41:56 +1000 (AEST)
Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112)
 id 5B76F9E99B; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 04:41:56 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122])
 by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FA279E998
 for <tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 04:41:56 +1000 (AEST)
Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178)
 id 50F5518C08D; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 14:41:55 -0400 (EDT)
To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org
Message-Id: <20180925184155.50F5518C08D@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 14:41:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
Subject: Re: [TUHS] SPARC is CRAPS spelled backwards.
X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list <tuhs.minnie.tuhs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tuhs>,
 <mailto:tuhs-request@minnie.tuhs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/>
List-Post: <mailto:tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tuhs-request@minnie.tuhs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tuhs>,
 <mailto:tuhs-request@minnie.tuhs.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org
Sender: "TUHS" <tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org>

    > From: Tony Finch

    > This paper has a nice survey of instruction set densities

And the winner is.... the PDP-11!

I'm not too surprised by this; back in the days of core memory (and limited,
at that - the first PDP-11's came standard with ... 8KB of memory :-), having
the denset possible code had real savings.

    Noel