From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 937e7c78 for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 11:24:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id E0053A1EC0; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 21:24:02 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D49A1AFD; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 21:23:46 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 16410A1AFD; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 21:23:45 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAA04A1AFC for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 21:23:44 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id 0398D18C08F; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 07:23:44 -0400 (EDT) To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org Message-Id: <20181007112344.0398D18C08F@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2018 07:23:44 -0400 (EDT) From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Subject: Re: [TUHS] Unix source code archive in the news X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" > From: jsteve > I'd say TripOS. There is some surce fragments but I never could get any > BCPL to cross build anything. I'm somewhat stunned to hear that, given that Martin Richards did both! What kind of things are the compilers complaining about? (And I'm also kind of amazed that Cambridge didn't make an effort to save Tripos.) Noel