From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 2711cd67 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 06:35:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 92833A21CA; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 16:35:19 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9669A21C5; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 16:34:44 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 684D3A21B0; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 15:24:49 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail.bitblocks.com (ns1.bitblocks.com [173.228.5.8]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06567A21AD for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 15:24:49 +1000 (AEST) Received: from bitblocks.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bitblocks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93EC6156E40C; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 22:24:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Bakul Shah To: ron minnich In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 01 Nov 2018 09:48:38 -0700." References: <20181031043810.GA10775@minnie.tuhs.org> <20181101074231.GA4844@vagabond> Comments: In-reply-to ron minnich message dated "Thu, 01 Nov 2018 09:48:38 -0700." MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <27780.1541136267.1@bitblocks.com> Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2018 22:24:27 -0700 Message-Id: <20181102052434.93EC6156E40C@mail.bitblocks.com> Subject: Re: [TUHS] Unix APIs: elegant or not? X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On Thu, 01 Nov 2018 09:48:38 -0700 ron minnich wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 9:44 AM Warner Losh wrote: > > > > There's another school of thought too that says the kernel has no business > > parsing strings with all the security implications of doing so... Which is more a function of C. A proper string type might've helped. I would argue it is *easier* to debug string based stuff than all those ioctls using magic numbers replaced with #defines. > And, further, that network architecture I referenced is much less efficient > than the BSD model -- 5 system calls per accept! so that was starting to > hit us here on the Akaros project, since we imported the entire Plan 9 > network stack into akaros, along with the drivers. Linux left us in the > dust on network connections/second. We were going to change it had Akaros > continued. What sort of changes were you contemplating? I view(ed) 9p more as a prototype.