From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id e388d9a0 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2019 04:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id BE921A2046; Sat, 5 Jan 2019 14:20:41 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA774A1C5C; Sat, 5 Jan 2019 14:20:15 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 45913A1C5C; Sat, 5 Jan 2019 14:20:13 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55C32A1C50 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2019 14:20:12 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id 49D7118C0B2; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 23:20:11 -0500 (EST) To: tuhs@tuhs.org Message-Id: <20190105042011.49D7118C0B2@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 23:20:11 -0500 (EST) From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Subject: Re: [TUHS] Isaacson v Unix X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" From: Doug McIlroy > I have heard also that Isaacson's "Idea Factory" (about Bell Labs) I was unable to find a book of this title by Isaacson? Did you mean the work of this title by Jon Gertner? (I have yet to pull down my copy to see what it says about Unix - it's in another room, and I'm lazy... :-) > (In my recollection, McCarthy proseletized; Corbato led.) I think that's an accurate 1-sentence summary. > breathes not a word about Berkeley's work, without which ARPANET would > have been an open circuit. Can you elaborate on this point a bit - I'm not sure what it is you're referring to? > A couple of reviews predicted it would become the standard of the > field. Among people who spell 'Internet' with a lower-case 'i', perhaps it will (sadly). Noel