From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.2
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 615a7f30
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>;
	Sun, 6 Jan 2019 04:43:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112)
	id A560EA1F39; Sun,  6 Jan 2019 14:43:02 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29EB0A1C5C;
	Sun,  6 Jan 2019 14:42:30 +1000 (AEST)
Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112)
 id E6199A1C5C; Sun,  6 Jan 2019 14:42:25 +1000 (AEST)
X-Greylist: delayed 388 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at minnie.tuhs.org;
 Sun, 06 Jan 2019 14:42:25 AEST
Received: from mail.bitblocks.com (ns1.bitblocks.com [173.228.5.8])
 by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B8D4A1C50
 for <tuhs@tuhs.org>; Sun,  6 Jan 2019 14:42:25 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from bitblocks.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.bitblocks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2DFD156E410
 for <tuhs@tuhs.org>; Sat,  5 Jan 2019 20:35:49 -0800 (PST)
From: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>
To: tuhs@tuhs.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 04 Jan 2019 21:26:44 -0500."
 <201901050226.x052QigU089781@tahoe.cs.Dartmouth.EDU>
References: <201901050226.x052QigU089781@tahoe.cs.Dartmouth.EDU>
Comments: In-reply-to Doug McIlroy <doug@cs.dartmouth.edu>
 message dated "Fri, 04 Jan 2019 21:26:44 -0500."
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <38615.1546749349.1@bitblocks.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2019 20:35:49 -0800
Message-Id: <20190106043556.F2DFD156E410@mail.bitblocks.com>
Subject: Re: [TUHS] Isaacson v Unix
X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list <tuhs.minnie.tuhs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tuhs>,
 <mailto:tuhs-request@minnie.tuhs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/>
List-Post: <mailto:tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tuhs-request@minnie.tuhs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tuhs>,
 <mailto:tuhs-request@minnie.tuhs.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org
Sender: "TUHS" <tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org>

> "Innovators" won general critical praise. A couple of reviews predicted
> it would become the standard of the field. However, an evidently
> knowledgeable review in IEEE Annals of the History of Computing faulted
> it for peddling familiar potted legends without really digging for
> deeper insight. Regarding Thompson and Ritchie, it looks more like
> overt suppression.

Why not ask @WalterIsaacson on twitter. He was chairman & CEO
of CNN and managing editor of Time among other things so
presumably he is/was interested in facts.