From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 8cabbd8f for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2019 04:53:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 46D13A1F37; Sun, 6 Jan 2019 14:53:05 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44822A1F2A; Sun, 6 Jan 2019 14:52:43 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 53A26A1C5C; Sun, 6 Jan 2019 14:52:42 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail.bitblocks.com (ns1.bitblocks.com [173.228.5.8]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EABD0A1C50 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2019 14:52:41 +1000 (AEST) Received: from bitblocks.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bitblocks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D436A156E410 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2019 20:52:34 -0800 (PST) From: Bakul Shah To: tuhs@tuhs.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 05 Jan 2019 20:35:49 -0800." <20190106043556.F2DFD156E410@mail.bitblocks.com> References: <201901050226.x052QigU089781@tahoe.cs.Dartmouth.EDU> <20190106043556.F2DFD156E410@mail.bitblocks.com> Comments: In-reply-to Bakul Shah message dated "Sat, 05 Jan 2019 20:35:49 -0800." MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <39163.1546750354.1@bitblocks.com> Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2019 20:52:34 -0800 Message-Id: <20190106045241.D436A156E410@mail.bitblocks.com> Subject: Re: [TUHS] Isaacson v Unix X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On Sat, 05 Jan 2019 20:35:49 -0800 Bakul Shah wrote: Bakul Shah writes: > > "Innovators" won general critical praise. A couple of reviews predicted > > it would become the standard of the field. However, an evidently > > knowledgeable review in IEEE Annals of the History of Computing faulted > > it for peddling familiar potted legends without really digging for > > deeper insight. Regarding Thompson and Ritchie, it looks more like > > overt suppression. > > Why not ask @WalterIsaacson on twitter. He was chairman & CEO > of CNN and managing editor of Time among other things so > presumably he is/was interested in facts. And a professor of history at Tulane. I am sure he is interested in getting the history right, right?!