The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Steinhart <jon@fourwinds.com>
To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org
Subject: Re: [TUHS] Women in computing
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 12:37:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201902142037.x1EKbpnR017241@darkstar.fourwinds.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1b71e45e-5711-ee8d-2bc8-4ea6298311dd@solar.stanford.edu>

Deborah Scherrer writes:
> There have been several studies.  As I remember, girls in school do 
> indeed receive as much encouragement in computers as do males.  And 
> girls do indeed have access to as many resources as males.  So the 
> studies came to no conclusions.
>
> My personal thought is that, in high school, it's the "nerd" factor.  If 
> I were back in high school and saw the kind of guys that are getting 
> into computers now, I would stay a thousand miles away from them and 
> that field.  But, alas, I don't think anyone has tried to research that 
> idea...
>
> And/or: I have a friend who was a professor of CS in Amsterdam.  She had 
> many grad students of both sexes.  She says she had to practically force 
> the women to stay in the field.   They would see the guys getting overly 
> focused on the computer details themselves, completely overlooking the 
> goals of the project.  The women would get frustrated and complain to 
> the professor.  She would have to convince them that the guys just did 
> that, and that the women should stay on track.
>
> I do admit, I have a husband who does that.  Personally, I have ALWAYS 
> looked at computers as a tool to accomplish something grander than just 
> being a computer.  But I am usually out-shouted.  ;-)

I think that many of us old folk on this list started out in a time when
getting a computer to be a computer was an accomplishment.  But I agree
that enough of that has been done that using computers as tools subservient
to larger goals is where the bulk of the work exists today.

There's a theory that sounds superficially plausible to me, which is that
women leave the field because they're more responsible than men.  The theory
is that women think more about whether a profession will provide them with
the security and stability necessary to support a family.  When women look
at STEM fields they see people being laid off, being forced to train their
outsourced replacements, and so on.  The American government sends out the
mixed messages of "we need people trained in STEM" along with "we don't care
about science".  Plus there are all of the pontifications about how AI is
going to replace many of the jobs.  So this theory says that it just doesn't
look like an attractive field to people who want stability and security, and
that women statistically want that more than men do.

Jon

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-14 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-14 19:29 Noel Chiappa
2019-02-14 19:47 ` Seth Morabito
2019-02-14 20:02 ` Deborah Scherrer
2019-02-14 20:30   ` Larry McVoy
2019-02-14 20:37   ` Jon Steinhart [this message]
2019-02-14 22:22     ` Toby Thain
2019-02-14 22:37       ` Deborah Scherrer
2019-02-14 23:35         ` Andy Kosela
2019-02-14 23:45           ` Thomas Kellar
2019-02-14 23:46             ` Deborah Scherrer
2019-02-14 23:52             ` Jon Steinhart
2019-02-14 23:40       ` Larry McVoy
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-02-14 13:14 John P. Linderman
2019-02-14 14:02 ` Finn O'Leary
2019-02-14 18:51 ` Deborah Scherrer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201902142037.x1EKbpnR017241@darkstar.fourwinds.com \
    --to=jon@fourwinds.com \
    --cc=tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).