From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 12eebb5b for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 19:05:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 46DA39BDBB; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 05:05:41 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8F09BCD7; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 05:05:35 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id B2E269BCD7; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 05:05:34 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mcvoy.com (mcvoy.com [192.169.23.250]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75D6F9BCD0 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 05:05:34 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mcvoy.com (Postfix, from userid 3546) id 14D0835E0A8; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:05:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:05:34 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: Chet Ramey Message-ID: <20190828190534.GH13570@mcvoy.com> References: <201908281841.x7SIfQS7053036@tahoe.cs.Dartmouth.EDU> <201908281849.x7SInUE1024803@freefriends.org> <93732314-1521-3118-47c0-5b973b7b926e@case.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <93732314-1521-3118-47c0-5b973b7b926e@case.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Subject: Re: [TUHS] dmr streams & networking [was: Re: If not Linux, then what?] X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: tuhs@tuhs.org, doug@cs.dartmouth.edu Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 03:03:34PM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote: > On 8/28/19 2:49 PM, arnold@skeeve.com wrote: > > >> Sorry, what I said about London/Reiser is true, but not the whole > >> story. L/R didn't have demand paging; BSD did. > > > > But my question still stands. Why didn't Research keep going from L/R > > and add demand paging? Wouldn't that have been "cleaner" than starting > > from BSD? > > It's my impression that BSD had done other work that Research didn't want > to duplicate, like autoconfiguration, device support, and so on. Joy got > a lot out of the VAX hardware. He was a coding machine back then. Quite the legacy.