From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id a1f9bdba for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 05:50:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 151219B9AF; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:50:44 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF6494820; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:50:24 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 0DC4A94820; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:50:21 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail.bitblocks.com (ns1.bitblocks.com [173.228.5.8]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0911947B9 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:50:19 +1000 (AEST) Received: from bitblocks.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bitblocks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92151570CE9 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 22:50:12 -0700 (PDT) To: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:22:58 +1000." References: <20190911181101.GF3143@mcvoy.com> <20190912034346.GJ2046@mcvoy.com> <20190912043308.GL2046@mcvoy.com> Comments: In-reply-to Dave Horsfall message dated "Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:22:58 +1000." From: Bakul Shah MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <11585.1568353812.1@bitblocks.com> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 22:50:12 -0700 Message-Id: <20190913055019.B92151570CE9@mail.bitblocks.com> Subject: Re: [TUHS] SCCS X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:22:58 +1000 Dave Horsfall wrote: > On Wed, 11 Sep 2019, Larry McVoy wrote: > > > Yeah, this was one of things that BitKeeper addressed. It was easier to > > use and every commit was a tag. > > That reminds me: I really must take another look at BK for my stuff. > > At the moment I'm using say "fred.c-" for the previous version etc (and > "fred.c+" for something finished but not quite ready to install). > > I've also renamed entire directory trees to sub-tree under "OLD" etc :-) > > SCCS/RCS are history as far as I'm concerned; I never quite got the hang > of CVS (which OpenLDAP uses); and I've heard all sorts of horror stories > about GIT to keep me away from it... I used to know CVS quite well. Then I switched to mercurial (for my own projects). Then to git. git has its problems but it has worked well enough. With just a few commands you can get a lot done with it. If you rely on/ contribute to any open source projects, you pretty much have to know it these days.