From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.2
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 437f2a2c
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>;
	Wed, 9 Oct 2019 21:05:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112)
	id 9276494705; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 07:05:31 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14D393D09;
	Thu, 10 Oct 2019 07:05:17 +1000 (AEST)
Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112)
 id E9FDF93D09; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 07:05:15 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from mail.bitblocks.com (ns1.bitblocks.com [173.228.5.8])
 by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03FF593D06
 for <tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 07:05:14 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from bitblocks.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.bitblocks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3660156E80B
 for <tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>; Wed,  9 Oct 2019 14:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
To: TUHS main list <tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 09 Oct 2019 13:09:42 -0700."
 <20191009200942.GA73878@wopr>
References: <1570559927.29337.for-standards-violators@oclsc.org>
 <2e6e1005-3bbf-5dcc-3fcc-099864c752dc@kilonet.net>
 <alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1910090753420.52199@aneurin.horsfall.org>
 <8088e5bd-3530-d3e1-8066-db6ea9389dea@kilonet.net>
 <CACCFpdx_6oeyNkgH_5jgfxbxWbZ6VtOXQNKOsonHPF2=747ZOw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKzdPgw0Vz8UFbK7c_Jr+RHGMssSxN=t8W36J0FMTPt5w+wkgA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20191009200942.GA73878@wopr>
Comments: In-reply-to Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net>
 message dated "Wed, 09 Oct 2019 13:09:42 -0700."
From: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <38949.1570655106.1@bitblocks.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 14:05:06 -0700
Message-Id: <20191009210513.B3660156E80B@mail.bitblocks.com>
Subject: Re: [TUHS] Recovered /etc/passwd files
X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list <tuhs.minnie.tuhs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tuhs>,
 <mailto:tuhs-request@minnie.tuhs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/>
List-Post: <mailto:tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tuhs-request@minnie.tuhs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tuhs>,
 <mailto:tuhs-request@minnie.tuhs.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org
Sender: "TUHS" <tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org>

On Wed, 09 Oct 2019 13:09:42 -0700 Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 09:59:43AM -1000, Rob Pike wrote:
> > =

> > Interesting though it is, though, I find this hacking distasteful. It =
was
> > distasteful back when, and it still is. The attitudes around hackery h=
ave
> > changed; the position nowadays seems to be that the bad guys are doing=
 it
> > so the good guys should be rewarded for doing it first. That's disinge=
nuous
> > at best, and dangerous at worst.
> > =

>
> And not really relevant to this topic, in fact.  It's not like we're
> sitting around rainbow-tabling someone's Macbook.  This stuff is, at
> this point, of historical interest.  "How many decades old must a hash
> be before it's acceptable to decode it" is a valid question worth
> answering, but comparing this kind of archaeology to active attack is
> slightly absurd.

I feel more than slightly absurd asking this but is the
password ken used in 1980 is of "historical interest"?