From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 15991cce for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 02:02:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 491AF9BCC9; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 12:02:51 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851E89B595; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 12:02:28 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 5A40E9B595; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 12:02:11 +1000 (AEST) Received: from wopr.sciops.net (wopr.sciops.net [216.126.196.60]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E09193D06 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 12:02:10 +1000 (AEST) Received: (qmail 53225 invoked by uid 1001); 22 Oct 2019 19:02:03 -0700 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 19:02:03 -0700 From: Kurt H Maier To: Mary Ann Horton Message-ID: <20191023020203.GA47206@wopr> Mail-Followup-To: Mary Ann Horton , tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org References: <20191021062242.GA91599@indra.papnet.eu> <20191022180705.GD51849@server.rulingia.com> <7455e361-b2fd-96b3-b9cd-37730f9aeed7@mhorton.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <7455e361-b2fd-96b3-b9cd-37730f9aeed7@mhorton.net> Subject: Re: [TUHS] PDP-7 UNIX filesystem X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 05:07:33PM -0700, Mary Ann Horton wrote: > dd is deprecated?  I'm surprised. I use it all the time. dd is not deprecated. The maintainer of the jargon file is not a reliable narrator. dd(1) is even specified in IEEE Std 1003.1-2017, which mentions the JCL history and explains that it takes 'operands' and not 'options' to retain compatibility with the original syntax. dd(1) on Plan 9 changes to regular option flags, such as -if= and -of=, and some folks get disproportionately annoyed by the change. Can't please everyone, I guess. khm