From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: (qmail 6660 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2020 17:43:40 -0000 Received-SPF: pass (minnie.tuhs.org: domain of minnie.tuhs.org designates 45.79.103.53 as permitted sender) receiver=inbox.vuxu.org; client-ip=45.79.103.53 envelope-from= Received: from unknown (HELO minnie.tuhs.org) (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTP; 28 Mar 2020 17:43:40 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 13A0D9D9C2; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 03:43:36 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D3619D577; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 03:43:12 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 3387A9D577; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 03:43:11 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF7C39D56C for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 03:43:10 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id DD9CE18C0A1; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 13:43:09 -0400 (EDT) To: tuhs@tuhs.org Message-Id: <20200328174309.DD9CE18C0A1@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 13:43:09 -0400 (EDT) From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Subject: Re: [TUHS] Article on Unix pipes history X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" > From: Warren Toomey > Quite good Yes. The second part of: "Sixth Edition sources are much more widely available than earlier versions, thanks largely to the Lions book" is I believe incorrect, though; I reckon it's because V6 was so widely distributed, both inside and outside Bell. Many more copies -> higher probability of retention. Also, from 'Source code listing for the Lions' Commentary in PDF and PostScript': "in 1988 I discovered an old 9-track tape being discarded of a PDP11 backup. It was hard to determine what it was running, but it did have an intact /usr/src/ tree of which most of the files were timesamped 1979, even at that time it seemed ancient. So it was either 7th edition or a derivative like PWB, which I believe it was. Do you still have the tape, or its contents? Noel