From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 22825 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2020 20:43:25 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 3 Dec 2020 20:43:25 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 0AC059CA56; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 06:43:21 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42EFB9CA4B; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 06:43:05 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id DE7C49CA4B; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 06:43:02 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mcvoy.com (mcvoy.com [192.169.23.250]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 327E39CA4A for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 06:43:02 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mcvoy.com (Postfix, from userid 3546) id 63B4735E1B5; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 12:43:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 12:43:01 -0800 From: Larry McVoy To: Niklas Karlsson Message-ID: <20201203204301.GW19746@mcvoy.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Subject: Re: [TUHS] The UNIX Command Language (1976) X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: tuhs@tuhs.org Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 09:37:17PM +0100, Niklas Karlsson wrote: > Den tors 3 dec. 2020 kl 21:32 skrev M Douglas McIlroy < > m.douglas.mcilroy@dartmouth.edu>: > > > There's a back story. The paper appears in the proceedings of a > > conference held in London in 1973, a few months after the advent of > > pipes. While preparing the presentation, Ken was inspired to invent > > and install the pipe operator. His talk wouldn't have been nearly as > > compelling had it been expressed in the original pipeline syntax (for > > which I take the blame). > > > > Now I'm curious. Is there anywhere I can read about the original pipeline > syntax? I tried searching a bit, but the only mention that was even vaguely > informative only stated that > was involved. Wasn't there a version that was cat whatever ^ wc -l ?