From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 1593 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2021 14:51:23 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 1 Apr 2021 14:51:23 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 3BE5C9C83A; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 00:51:21 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C09B19C63E; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 00:50:34 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 172609C63E; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 00:50:33 +1000 (AEST) Received: from gran.naleco.com (91.74.9.212.dynamic.jazztel.es [212.9.74.91]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71D0D9C63D for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 00:50:31 +1000 (AEST) Received: by gran.naleco.com (Postfix, from userid 1012) id ACBCE11DB; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:50:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:50:27 +0200 From: Josh Good To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org Message-ID: <20210401145025.GA1202@naleco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: [TUHS] Zombified SCO comes back from the dead, brings trial back to life against IBM X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" I read the news, and I could not believe it. It's April 1st, ain't it? But then, this looks like is dated March 31. So it could be for real. Behold: https://www.theregister.com/2021/03/31/ibm_redhat_xinuos/ The PDF also is dated March 31: https://regmedia.co.uk/2021/03/31/xinuos_complaint.pdf It's hard to believe someone would go to the trouble of writing 57 pages of legalese just to make a damn joke. " Xinuos, formed around SCO Group assets a decade ago under the name UnXis and at the time disavowing any interest in continuing SCO's long-running Linux litigation, today sued IBM and Red Hat for alleged copyright and antitrust law violations. "First, IBM stole Xinuos' intellectual property and used that stolen property to build and sell a product to compete with Xinuos itself," the US Virgin Islands-based software biz claims in its complaint [PDF]. "Second, stolen property in IBM's hand, IBM and Red Hat illegally agreed to divide the relevant market and use their growing market powers to victimize consumers, innovative competitors, and innovation itself." The complaint further contends that after the two companies conspired to divide the market, IBM then acquired Red Hat to solidify its position. SCO Group in 2003 made a similar intellectual property claim. It argued that SCO Group owned the rights to AT&T's Unix and UnixWare operating system source code, that Linux 2.4.x and 2.5.x were unauthorized derivatives of Unix, and that IBM violated its contractual obligations by distributing Linux code. That case dragged on for years, and drew a fair amount of attention when SCO Group said it would sue individual Linux users for infringement. Though SCO filed for bankruptcy in 2007 and some of the claims have been dismissed, its case against IBM remains unresolved. There was a status report filed on February 16, 2018, details remaining claims and counterclaims. And in May last year, Magistrate Judge Paul Warner was no longer assigned to oversee settlement discussions. But SCO Group v. IBM is still open. " Either way, some one if fooling us hard. PS: OK, it seems it's for real: https://www.xinuos.com/xinuos-sues-ibm-and-red-hat/ I need to check my stock of pop corn, then... My take: it's obvious they want to be a nuisance so that IBM settles the case, so they then can go back home with some fresh cash. I hope IBM goes ballistic on them to the bitter end, and finally sends the zombie back to its grave. But then, IBM now has its new RedHat business to protect, so it can get interesting. -- Josh Good