From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 6029 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2021 15:29:11 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 1 Apr 2021 15:29:11 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 256E99C886; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 01:28:43 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF639CA01; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 01:28:24 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 0960F9C86F; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 01:28:14 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mcvoy.com (mcvoy.com [192.169.23.250]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 242CB9C830 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 01:28:11 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mcvoy.com (Postfix, from userid 3546) id A9AA635E351; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 08:28:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 08:28:10 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: Ron Natalie Message-ID: <20210401152810.GI4209@mcvoy.com> References: <87zgyi5bhj.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Subject: Re: [TUHS] 30th Anniversary of most epic netnews post X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 03:20:32PM +0000, Ron Natalie wrote: > Thanks, I was looking for the older ones and couldn't find them. > I knew the "tired of seeing this post" thing meant I was looking at a > reprise. > > By the way, for those who don't know. Spaf didn't write any of it. The > message itself was the spoof warned about (and all the "ways to tell" appear > in the message/headers). It's always amazed me that courts will take emails as "evidence" because it is absolutely trivial to fake them. Unless they've added some crypto host identification (have they?) --lm