From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 19543 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2021 20:44:38 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 3 Jul 2021 20:44:38 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id A1EFD9C9D4; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 06:44:34 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21AA9C86C; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 06:44:15 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 425959C86C; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 06:44:13 +1000 (AEST) X-Greylist: delayed 2183 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at minnie.tuhs.org; Sun, 04 Jul 2021 06:44:11 AEST Received: from fourwinds.com (fourwinds.com [63.64.179.162]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40B979C864 for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 06:44:11 +1000 (AEST) Received: from darkstar.fourwinds.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fourwinds.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 163K7l2m2490666 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 3 Jul 2021 13:07:47 -0700 Received: from darkstar.fourwinds.com (jon@localhost) by darkstar.fourwinds.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id 163K7lW72490663 for ; Sat, 3 Jul 2021 13:07:47 -0700 Message-Id: <202107032007.163K7lW72490663@darkstar.fourwinds.com> From: Jon Steinhart To: TUHS main list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2490661.1625342867.1@darkstar.fourwinds.com> Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2021 13:07:47 -0700 X-JON-SPAM: local delivery Subject: Re: [TUHS] The Unix shell: a 50-year view X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" Wow. This is a terrible paper. It's full of of incorrect, unsubstiantiated, and meaningless statements. It's so bad in my opinion that I'm not sorry that I dropped my ACM membership a while ago. These folks really needed an editor. The paper annoys me so much that I've decided to write a lengthy note to the authors which I'll post here once I'm done. Jon