From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 31659 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2021 00:33:23 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 17 Sep 2021 00:33:23 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 944499CAD6; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 10:33:20 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACD49CAB3; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 10:32:59 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 814719CAB3; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 10:32:58 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mcvoy.com (mcvoy.com [192.169.23.250]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01B329CAB2 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 10:32:57 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mcvoy.com (Postfix, from userid 3546) id 9DC9835E088; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 17:32:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 17:32:57 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: Jon Steinhart Message-ID: <20210917003257.GA18465@mcvoy.com> References: <202109161934.18GJYFsl881498@darkstar.fourwinds.com> <20210916194103.GK26820@mcvoy.com> <202109162345.18GNjFGn3316576@darkstar.fourwinds.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202109162345.18GNjFGn3316576@darkstar.fourwinds.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Subject: Re: [TUHS] ATC/OSDI'21 joint keynote: It's Time for Operating Systems to Rediscover Hardware (Timothy Roscoe) X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: TUHS main list Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 04:45:15PM -0700, Jon Steinhart wrote: > Larry McVoy writes: > > I think it is that the newer kids are less willing to understand stuff. > > So they build something on top that they understand. I agree that they > > will hit problems and likely build "safe deposit boxes" because the > > containers are "too complex". > > Like usual, we agree on this sort of stuff. A conundrum for me is that > this stuff that "they understand" is in my opinion way more complicated > than understanding computer hardware and/or an operating system. So I'm > not sure where the win is. Someone, sorry, I suck at names, I think he is in aerospace or similar, had a pretty rational view on why docker made things easier. It was today so should be easy to find. The part that I don't understand is why it seems so hard to deploy stuff today. We supported the same application, a pretty complicated one, 636K lines of code, on every Unix variant, Linux {32,64} {every arch including IBM 360}, MacOS {PPC, x86, and I'm working on M1}, Windows {XP..} and it wasn't that hard. Granted, of the core team, I'm the least intelligent so I hired well, but still.