From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 22248 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2021 20:57:43 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 15 Nov 2021 20:57:43 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 708CB9C64F; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 06:57:38 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E019C69F; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 06:57:21 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=tuhs.org; s=dkim; t=1637009852; bh=U3jLhXRY7jxC33WvyQ7HN760GUtaBkgqL48SV5MOCLs=; h=Date:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Cc:From; b=o++4/KRkEWCS9+c1TFouTN5YRGdSINQjFo1XJ9Gq8XAACylNtrYiXvhtQx0y4hAYk edPw3mdI/cJZlpm3L7zf51J8+j7HpBEAC0uqOes9ahiwdb6hurFNBi0RNadGjvezbv d2/8Pc193v75ZvGPwzqujvJhbjhZU2CiU0a1uX9k= Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5F6079C1E1; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 06:57:11 +1000 (AEST) Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 06:57:11 +1000 From: Warren Toomey To: Noel Chiappa Message-ID: <20211115205711.GA16126@minnie.tuhs.org> References: <20211115192726.6AD6818C090@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211115192726.6AD6818C090@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Subject: Re: [TUHS] [COFF] Double posting X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: coff@minnie.tuhs.org Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 02:27:26PM -0500, Noel Chiappa wrote: > OK, I can see sending an _initial_ query to both lists, to get it to as wide > a circle as possible: _but_ BCC at least one of them, to prevent lazy people > just hitting 'reply all' and thereby sanding out multiple copies of their > reply. I've just disabled "require explicit destination" on both the TUHS and COFF lists. Let's see if that allows bcc between them. Cheers, Warren