From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 13501 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2021 14:20:31 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 23 Dec 2021 14:20:31 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 5E9B49CECB; Fri, 24 Dec 2021 00:20:29 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB4CF9CC2E; Fri, 24 Dec 2021 00:20:01 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 5E8E29CC2E; Fri, 24 Dec 2021 00:19:59 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mcvoy.com (mcvoy.com [192.169.23.250]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F25F59CC00 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2021 00:19:58 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mcvoy.com (Postfix, from userid 3546) id 94DB535E0B1; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 06:19:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 06:19:58 -0800 From: Larry McVoy To: Michael Kj??rling Message-ID: <20211223141958.GR24180@mcvoy.com> References: <818A6F70-D117-471A-9E08-E37B34F8FAE0@mac.com> <20211223021805.GK24180@mcvoy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Subject: Re: [TUHS] Photos of University Computer Labs X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 01:05:55PM +0000, Michael Kj??rling wrote: > On 22 Dec 2021 18:18 -0800, from lm@mcvoy.com (Larry McVoy): > > The CP/M machines bring back different memories, using that and BDS > > C because an 11/780 with 4MB of ram and 40 users meant each user was > > getting 1KB so it swapped and swapped and swapped. > > 4 MB RAM and 40 users works out to 100 KB of RAM per user for me. Even > accounting for a large at the time OS it should be several tens of > kilobytes per user on average for actual useful data. So, because > there's probably some detail here that means you're right and I'm > wrong, how do you arrive at the figure 1 KB of RAM per user in that > scenario? Probably boomer doing math wrong. You are right, I'm wrong. Though I will say that 100K/student was _painful_. Not enough to run make/cc in any reasonable time. About the only thing that worked was ^t (I think that was it) that showed you some basic info about performance.