From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 32532 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2022 14:09:16 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 14 Jan 2022 14:09:16 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 9581A9D4F1; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 00:09:11 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3CC9D4B3; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 00:08:58 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 8AC5F9D06B; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 00:08:56 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mcvoy.com (mcvoy.com [192.169.23.250]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E84D9CFC6 for ; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 00:08:56 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mcvoy.com (Postfix, from userid 3546) id C719135E823; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 06:08:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 06:08:55 -0800 From: Larry McVoy To: Jaap Akkerhuis Message-ID: <20220114140855.GB11735@mcvoy.com> References: <3BEC16DC-5F58-4D9E-8577-7578DE696F03@xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3BEC16DC-5F58-4D9E-8577-7578DE696F03@xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Subject: Re: [TUHS] Brian Kernighan and very early *roff history X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 11:13:35AM +0100, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote: > > > > On Jan 14, 2022, at 1:10, Rob Pike wrote: > > > > Dennis spent quite a bit of time cleaning up the troff code in the late 1980s, if I remember right, moving it to modern C. He got annoyed by it one day. > > If I remember correctly, it was actually Ken. He also turned it > in a single binary. (Troff -N turned it into nroff). > > > It was the "ditroff" variant although honestly I don't remember us ever calling it that. It was just the current version of troff. Not sure where the name came from. Perhaps it was us but I think of it as a foreign name. > > Originally Brian called it "Typesetter Independent Troff" in the > article he wrote about it and for some reason people started to > call it "Device Independent". TIT vs DIT might be why?