From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 8724 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2022 15:53:09 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 1 Feb 2022 15:53:09 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 4E51F9D4DA; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 01:52:38 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA519B9EC; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 01:52:31 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 343599B95E; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 01:52:29 +1000 (AEST) Received: from relay05.pair.com (relay05.pair.com [216.92.24.67]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 098EA9D44A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 01:52:28 +1000 (AEST) Received: from orac.inputplus.co.uk (unknown [84.93.99.127]) by relay05.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C903F1A433B for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 10:52:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from orac.inputplus.co.uk (orac.inputplus.co.uk [IPv6:::1]) by orac.inputplus.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A9541FB21 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 15:52:25 +0000 (GMT) To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org From: Ralph Corderoy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-reply-to: <202202011537.211FbYSe017204@freefriends.org> References: <202202011537.211FbYSe017204@freefriends.org> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2022 15:52:25 +0000 Message-Id: <20220201155225.5A9541FB21@orac.inputplus.co.uk> Subject: Re: [TUHS] ratfor vibe X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" Hi Arnold, > In ~ 1981, Kernighan and Plauger rewrote the tools in Pascal and redid > the book to go with it. This is > https://www.amazon.com/Software-Tools-Pascal-Brian-Kernighan/dp/0201103427/ > which I also recommend getting a copy of. I agree the original Software Tools is a must read, but having done so, why would I suffer working through the hurdles put in place by Pascal compared to Ratfor? I never bothered so your recommendation makes me wonder what I missed. I did read Kernighan's ‘not my favourite’ and took from that I wouldn't enjoy the Pascal book given I'd read the original. -- Cheers, Ralph.