From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 2818 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2022 22:43:54 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 16 Feb 2022 22:43:54 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id CDF7D9D3B1; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 08:43:50 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BA59D038; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 08:42:58 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 712499D038; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 08:42:57 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mcvoy.com (mcvoy.com [192.169.23.250]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 875CB9D035 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 08:42:54 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mcvoy.com (Postfix, from userid 3546) id 155FB35E817; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:42:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:42:54 -0800 From: Larry McVoy To: Dave Horsfall Message-ID: <20220216224254.GA3040@mcvoy.com> References: <202202160754.21G7sbUa011318@freefriends.org> <1nKFRN-4IZ-00@marmaro.de> <8735kig8vb.fsf@vuxu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Subject: Re: [TUHS] Lorinda Cherry X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 09:27:39AM +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: > Indeed, when a lot of compilers recognised the Sieve of Eratosthenes being > used and optimised for it... Wasn't all that long ago that vehicle > manufacturers also started doing the same thing :-) Indeed. I hated when people cheated because benchmarks should teach you the capabilities of the machine being benchmarked. They aren't useful if people cheat. When I did LMbench, the rules were "cc -O2" and you could not link with any benchmarking libraries and you could only report a result if you reported all results. I had a beef with this guy: https://www.cs.jhu.edu/~shap/ because he had some toy OS that didn't have a VM system, didn't have networking, didn't have much of anything, but boy oh boy, did it context switch fast (because there was no context to speak of). He reported those numbers in blatant violation of my rules and I had to escalate to get him to stop. The bummer is he is a smart guy, capable of good work, there is no need to cheat.