The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org
Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [TUHS] Capitalization question: UNIX/Unix and MULTICS/Multics?
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 15:57:17 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220511195717.594E218C085@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> (raw)

    > From: Dan Cross

    > In Kernighan's Unix memoir, on page 9, he touches briefly on the
    > typography of "Unix":
    > "(Multics was originally spelled MULTICS ..."
    > Here, he is talking about interning at MIT in 1966. bwk would certainly
    > know better than me, but I can find no historical reference to this
    > "MULTICS" spelling; is anyone familiar with that?

I looked at my early Multics stuff, and it's "Multics" almost everywhere:

- "GE-645 System Manual", GE, 1968
- "The Multics Virtual Memory", GE, 1970
- "Introduction to Multics", MIT MAC TR-123, 1973

However, in my "A New Remote-Access Man-Machine System", on the title papge
it says "Reprints of the MULTICS system presented at the" [FJCC, 1965]. No clue as
to who printed it, or when - and all the FJCC papers themselves use "Multics".

I have yet to ask Jerry Saltzer, but I suspect that if it ever was 'MULTICS',
it was at a _very_ early stage, and was formally changed even before the FJCC
papers (which were themselves very early).


BTW, ISTR hearing that it was 'Unix' originally, and the 'UNIX' spelling was
adopted at the insistence of Bell lawyers. So I went looking for an early
(i.e. PDP-7 era) scanned document, to see what it was then, and all I could
find was:

  https://www.tuhs.org/Archive/Distributions/Research/McIlroy_v0/UnixEditionZero.pdf

which seems to be from just after the PDP-7 -> PDP-11/20 transition, and it
uses 'UNIX'. Would the Bell lawyers have already been involved at that stage?

	Noel

             reply	other threads:[~2022-05-11 19:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-11 19:57 Noel Chiappa [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-05-11 23:47 Douglas McIlroy
2022-05-12  0:34 ` Dan Cross
2022-05-11 17:13 Dan Cross
2022-05-11 18:08 ` James Frew

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220511195717.594E218C085@mercury.lcs.mit.edu \
    --to=jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu \
    --cc=tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).