From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 17446 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2022 21:16:45 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (50.116.15.146) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 8 Sep 2022 21:16:45 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31631421D0; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 07:16:41 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E409421BF for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 07:16:36 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id 4533B18C077; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 17:16:35 -0400 (EDT) To: tuhs@tuhs.org Message-Id: <20220908211635.4533B18C077@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 17:16:35 -0400 (EDT) From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Message-ID-Hash: 45AWRFEX3YN67YCZNNRN3HI3E5QNEVJY X-Message-ID-Hash: 45AWRFEX3YN67YCZNNRN3HI3E5QNEVJY X-MailFrom: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tuhs.tuhs.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1 Precedence: list Subject: [TUHS] Re: Does anybody know the etymology of the term "word" as in collection of bits? List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Jim Capp > See "The Preparation of Programs for an Electronic Digital Computer", > by Maurice V. Wilkes, David J. Wheeler, and Stanley Gill Blast! I looked in the index in my copy (ex the Caltech CS Dept Library :-), but didn't find 'word' in the index! Looking a little further, Turing's ACE Report, from 1946, uses the term (section 4, pg. 25; "minor cycle, or word"). My copy, the one edited by Carpenter and Doran, has a note #1 by them, "Turing seems to be the first user of 'word' with this meaning." I have Brian's email, I can ask him how they came to that determination, if you'd like. There aren't many things older than that! I looked quickly through the "First Draft on the EDVAC", 1945 (re-printed in "From ENIAC to UNIVAC", by Stein), but did not see word there. It does use the term "minor cycle", though. Other places worth checking are the IBM/Harvard Mark I, the ENIAC and ... I guess therer's not much else! Oh, there was a relay machine at Bell, too. The Atanasoff-Berry computer? > From: "John P. Linderman" > He claims that if you wanted to do decimal arithmetic on a binary > machine, you'd want to have 10 digits of accuracy to capture the 10 > digit log tables that were then popular. The EDVAC draft talks about needing 8 decimal digits (Appendix A, pg.190); apparently von Neumann knew that that's how many digits one needed for reasonable accuracy in differential equations. That is 27 "binary digits" (apparently 'bit' hadn't been coined yet). Noel