From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 8986 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2023 15:27:42 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (50.116.15.146) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 30 Jan 2023 15:27:42 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FE5C425D6; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 01:27:07 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mcvoy.com (mcvoy.com [192.169.23.250]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61EC3425D3 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 01:27:04 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mcvoy.com (Postfix, from userid 3546) id 093DD35E81C; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 07:27:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 07:27:03 -0800 From: Larry McVoy To: Dan Cross Message-ID: <20230130152703.GE12306@mcvoy.com> References: <202301300750.30U7oQTh013304@freefriends.org> <20230130150219.GD12306@mcvoy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Message-ID-Hash: 3IHHKUEITF3NVVFVLYWRC2CQ7TVNJ2VP X-Message-ID-Hash: 3IHHKUEITF3NVVFVLYWRC2CQ7TVNJ2VP X-MailFrom: lm@mcvoy.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tuhs.tuhs.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: tuhs@tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1 Precedence: list Subject: [TUHS] Re: FD 2 List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 10:16:25AM -0500, Dan Cross wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 10:02 AM Larry McVoy wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 07:09:55PM +1100, Rob Pike wrote: > > > And then we have pttys, speaking of pitys. > > > > I'm not seeing how you do stuff like ssh into a remote system and have > > job control, etc, work without some sort of tty. > > You don't. But perhaps that model isn't super great. > > There was no job control on plan9 and I can't say I ever missed it. If > I needed another terminal, I just swept open another window. Job > control, even remote access a la SSH (or telnet, or rlogin), are a bit > of an historical accident. If, instead, my computing environment is > the set of shared resources I've imported into my system, then I don't > necessarily need something like that. The plan9 `cpu` command, for > access to a remote CPU server, conceptually brought the CPU server to > you, not the other way around. > > It was a very different model. $ vi foo.c hack, hack ^Z $ make test test test, broken $ fg Yes, I could do that in 2 different terminals but that mode of working is extremely useful, works when I don't have a windowing system, I'm on the console. Not having that model is a deal breaker for me, and I suspect a non trivial number of other people.