From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 4121 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2023 10:09:08 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (50.116.15.146) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 10 Mar 2023 10:09:08 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CDD413E9; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 20:09:01 +1000 (AEST) Received: from relay05.pair.com (relay05.pair.com [216.92.24.67]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7D22413E6 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 20:08:57 +1000 (AEST) Received: from orac.inputplus.co.uk (unknown [84.51.130.45]) by relay05.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921111A257C for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 05:08:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from orac.inputplus.co.uk (orac.inputplus.co.uk [IPv6:::1]) by orac.inputplus.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C74931FBE4 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 10:08:55 +0000 (GMT) From: Ralph Corderoy To: tuhs@tuhs.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-reply-to: References: <20230309230130.q4I-f%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <849f8da7-8df2-619c-6080-d40d0ef6fc57@makerlisp.com> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 10:08:55 +0000 Message-Id: <20230310100855.C74931FBE4@orac.inputplus.co.uk> Message-ID-Hash: U3F6S5FWZB6LFQIKXSEOALSVEBWVEBCN X-Message-ID-Hash: U3F6S5FWZB6LFQIKXSEOALSVEBWVEBCN X-MailFrom: ralph@inputplus.co.uk X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1 Precedence: list Subject: [TUHS] Re: I can't drive 55: "GOTO considered harmful" 55th anniversary List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi Werner, > after a stint in Java with its multilevel break... Given sh(1)'s break takes an optional number of loops to break out of, I'm surprised C stuck with just the single-level break. -- Cheers, Ralph.