From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 16454 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2023 11:59:34 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (2600:3c01:e000:146::1) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 10 Mar 2023 11:59:34 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE704141A; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 21:59:30 +1000 (AEST) Received: from freefriends.org (freefriends.org [96.88.95.60]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A543A41406 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 21:59:24 +1000 (AEST) X-Envelope-From: arnold@skeeve.com Received: from freefriends.org (freefriends.org [96.88.95.60]) by freefriends.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 32ABxLB9007197 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Mar 2023 04:59:22 -0700 Received: (from arnold@localhost) by freefriends.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id 32ABxLSD007196; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 04:59:21 -0700 From: arnold@skeeve.com Message-Id: <202303101159.32ABxLSD007196@freefriends.org> X-Authentication-Warning: frenzy.freefriends.org: arnold set sender to arnold@skeeve.com using -f Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 04:59:21 -0700 To: tuhs@tuhs.org, ralph@inputplus.co.uk References: <20230309230130.q4I-f%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <849f8da7-8df2-619c-6080-d40d0ef6fc57@makerlisp.com> <20230310100855.C74931FBE4@orac.inputplus.co.uk> <202303101137.32ABbdfV003111@freefriends.org> <20230310115630.7466D212A8@orac.inputplus.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20230310115630.7466D212A8@orac.inputplus.co.uk> User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID-Hash: P6O6Q7VUOXTTLS2VKTKSIUUCNU7SHGBP X-Message-ID-Hash: P6O6Q7VUOXTTLS2VKTKSIUUCNU7SHGBP X-MailFrom: arnold@skeeve.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1 Precedence: list Subject: [TUHS] Re: I can't drive 55: "GOTO considered harmful" 55th anniversary List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Ralph Corderoy wrote: > > Remember too that the C compiler had to fit in a small space; having > > multilevel or labelled breaks requires more bookkeeping. > > Is it more bookkeeping than is already needed to handle the ends of the > nested for-loops, say? Yes, since you have to keep track of a label in a table somewhere that you can look up. Is it *that* much more that the PDP-11 C compiler could not have handled it? I don't know. Arnold