From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 30846 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2023 07:55:38 -0000
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (50.116.15.146)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 20 Mar 2023 07:55:38 -0000
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D0A41341;
	Mon, 20 Mar 2023 17:55:33 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from freefriends.org (freefriends.org [96.88.95.60])
	by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC2764133A
	for <tuhs@tuhs.org>; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 17:55:23 +1000 (AEST)
X-Envelope-From: arnold@skeeve.com
Received: from freefriends.org (freefriends.org [96.88.95.60])
	by freefriends.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 32K7tJqj023354
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT);
	Mon, 20 Mar 2023 01:55:20 -0600
Received: (from arnold@localhost)
	by freefriends.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id 32K7tIeW023352;
	Mon, 20 Mar 2023 01:55:18 -0600
From: arnold@skeeve.com
Message-Id: <202303200755.32K7tIeW023352@freefriends.org>
X-Authentication-Warning: frenzy.freefriends.org: arnold set sender to arnold@skeeve.com using -f
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 01:55:18 -0600
To: robpike@gmail.com, ralph@inputplus.co.uk
References: <Y8sUnihzhzTBOuKMJUnuV0DUZEqHb223xyoxXTmq-eMAe4HFZLgce38hxypW1K9UozOjAJxyXIpwzsWCfnZCRXTXictF--9hPEM__lviJ9A=@protonmail.com>
 <d90865c0-7c1c-c726-83c2-a7114e31bf19@aueb.gr>
 <20230319134701.3A262220F7@orac.inputplus.co.uk>
 <CAKzdPgxYPS3-XAJh2bzBRxSeJPO4tyietcNY+eyUvfYGR8fHow@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKzdPgxYPS3-XAJh2bzBRxSeJPO4tyietcNY+eyUvfYGR8fHow@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID-Hash: UTOUAQWMBKYUSSIWBBBN5MEU37GMU6NC
X-Message-ID-Hash: UTOUAQWMBKYUSSIWBBBN5MEU37GMU6NC
X-MailFrom: arnold@skeeve.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: tuhs@tuhs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1
Precedence: list
Subject: [TUHS] Re: Bell Foreign-Language UNIX Efforts
List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list <tuhs.tuhs.org>
Archived-At: <https://www.tuhs.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/tuhs@tuhs.org/message/UTOUAQWMBKYUSSIWBBBN5MEU37GMU6NC/>
List-Archive: <https://www.tuhs.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/tuhs@tuhs.org/>
List-Help: <mailto:tuhs-request@tuhs.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tuhs-owner@tuhs.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tuhs@tuhs.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tuhs-join@tuhs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tuhs-leave@tuhs.org>

Hi Rob.

Rob Pike <robpike@gmail.com> wrote:

> (Speaking of design by committee, the multibyte stuff in C89 was atrocious,
> and I heard was done in committee to get someone, perhaps the Japanese, to
> sign off.)

It's not lovely, but I wouldn't call it atrocious. It gets the job
done; code using it can handle multibyte encodings while being totally
character-set agnostic.  I speak from experience, gawk does this.
(I use the "restartable" routins - mbrlen() and so on.)

I understand that Unicode + UTF-8 solve the issue completely. But I'd
like to ask, in all seriousness and so that I can learn, given the world
as it was in 1989, how would you solve the problem? If you had designed
the C level routines, what would they have looked like?

Thanks,

Arnold