At 2023-06-19T10:48:27+0000, Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
> Sebastien F4GRX wrote:
> >> if(ap>ac) return(0*ap++);
> >
> > This was probably not intended but syntactically correct.
> 
> I could well believe it's not a typo, but a "clever" way to write
> 
>   if(ap>ac) {
>     ap++;
>     return 0;
>   }

/* You were not expected to understand that. */

Regards,
Branden