From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS,URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [50.116.15.146]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711182FC55 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2025 05:44:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A610943BB4; Thu, 14 Aug 2025 13:44:00 +1000 (AEST) Received: from freefriends.org (frenzy.freefriends.org [198.99.81.75]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3D7D43BB2 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2025 13:43:55 +1000 (AEST) X-Envelope-From: arnold@skeeve.com Received: from freefriends.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefriends.org (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 57E3hldJ075875 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 13 Aug 2025 21:43:47 -0600 Received: (from arnold@localhost) by freefriends.org (8.16.1/8.14.7/Submit) id 57E3hlEC075874; Wed, 13 Aug 2025 21:43:47 -0600 From: arnold@skeeve.com Message-Id: <202508140343.57E3hlEC075874@freefriends.org> X-Authentication-Warning: frenzy.freefriends.org: arnold set sender to arnold@skeeve.com using -f Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 21:43:47 -0600 To: tuhs@tuhs.org, martin@oneiros.de References: <20250813015509.GA17097@mcvoy.com> <202508131459.57DExwjZ032177@freefriends.org> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID-Hash: 43RKJZF4L2MVHPBRWPG6KWLMLPCDEV6W X-Message-ID-Hash: 43RKJZF4L2MVHPBRWPG6KWLMLPCDEV6W X-MailFrom: arnold@skeeve.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tuhs.tuhs.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1 Precedence: list Subject: [TUHS] Re: NFS 40th anniversary event List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Martin Schr=F6der wrote: > Am Mi., 13. Aug. 2025 um 17:00 Uhr schrieb : > > It was a different RFS, developed by USG. It had full Unix semantics, > > including ioctls and fcntl, for machines of the same architecture. It > > was stateful, which meant if the server went away, you could hang your > > shell at the very least. It first came out in SVR3. > > Was that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_File_Sharing ? Yes. > If so, that article wants some love from an expert. I"m not enough of an expert to tackle it. I used RFS in a classroom setting for a few years, but that's it, and that was ~ 30 years ago. > And what became of it? It never caught on. Source for it can be found in SVR3 and SVR4, if you have those. Arnold