From: tfb@tfeb.org (Tim Bradshaw)
Subject: [TUHS] Unix, eunuchs?
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 12:20:25 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22829.80.75.66.29.1149506425.squirrel@www.gradwell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44840A4F.1060005@icpnet.pl>
On Mon, June 5, 2006 11:41 am, Andrzej Popielewicz wrote:
>
> eunuch is pronounced as "yoo-nuk" (not all symbols reproduced) unit is
> "yoo-nit"
> unique is "yoo-neek"
>
> In Webster English Language Dictionary
>
>
> eunuch is "'yunek" unit is "'yunet" unique is "yu'nek,yu'nik"
>
> You can notice, that unix , more similar to unit or unique will be
> pronounced differently(?).
>
I think the position of the stress is important. `Unix', the way I
pronounce it (and I think the way everyone does) is stressed on the 1st
syllable, as is `eunuch' and `Multics'. To a large extent the distinction
in the sound of the 2nd syllable then doesn't matter because in typical
English dialects they all end up the same null sound (schwar? I forget the
name).
`unique' for instance has stress on second syllable, so really is very
different.
--tim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-05 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-03 13:57 Michael Welle
2006-06-04 20:44 ` Andrzej Popielewicz
2006-06-05 10:41 ` Andrzej Popielewicz
2006-06-05 11:20 ` Tim Bradshaw [this message]
2006-06-05 13:49 ` John Cowan
2006-06-05 14:14 ` Andrzej Popielewicz
2006-06-05 14:26 ` Wilko Bulte
2006-06-05 15:02 ` John Cowan
2006-06-13 7:19 ` Michael Welle
2006-06-05 15:13 ` Ian King
2006-06-13 7:40 ` Michael Welle
[not found] ` <001001c6875d$69b02e60$2f01a8c0@myhome.westell.com>
2006-06-13 7:20 ` Michael Welle
2006-06-05 15:57 James Petts
2006-06-05 16:28 ` John Cowan
2006-06-06 3:41 dmr
2006-06-06 8:21 ` Andrzej Popielewicz
2006-06-06 8:24 ` Andrzej Popielewicz
2006-06-06 8:26 ` Andrzej Popielewicz
2006-06-06 10:56 ` Andrzej Popielewicz
2006-06-06 7:18 Jose R Valverde
2006-06-06 13:58 ` John Cowan
2006-06-07 2:32 dmr
[not found] <mailman.5.1149732001.42765.tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
2006-06-08 5:22 ` John Chung
2006-06-09 8:30 ` Paul Osborne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22829.80.75.66.29.1149506425.squirrel@www.gradwell.com \
--to=tfb@tfeb.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).