From: Paul Ruizendaal <email@example.com> To: TUHS main list <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: [TUHS] PC Unix Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:20:43 +0200 Message-ID: <2313BFBA-8795-497F-AD46-46CCFC0E6E6C@planet.nl> (raw) > IBM famously failed to buy the well-established CP/M in > 1980. (CP/M had been introduced in 1974, before the > advent of the LSI-11 on which LSX ran.) By then IBM had > settled on Basic and Intel. I do not believe they ever > considered Unix and DEC, nor that AT&T considered > selling to IBM. (AT&T had--fortunately--long since been > rebuffed in an attempt to sell to DEC.) > > Doug Besides all the truth or legend around flying and signing NDA’s, I think there were clear economic reasons for ending up with Microsoft’s DOS, and the pre-cursor to that: picking the 8088.  By 1980 there were an estimated 8,000 software packages for CP/M available, many aimed at small business. IBM was targeting that. The availability of source level converters for 8080 code to 8088 code made porting economically feasible for the (cottage) ISV’s. This must have been a strong argument in favour of picking the 8088 for the original PC.  In line with their respective tried and tested business models, Digital Research offered CP/M-86 with a per-copy license structure. Microsoft offered QDOS with a one-off license structure. The latter was economically more attractive to IBM. I don’t think either side expected clones to happen the way they did, although they did probably factor in the appearance of non-compatible work-alikes. Although some sources suggest that going with the 68000 and/or Unix were considered, it would have left the new machine without an instant base of affordable small business applications. Speed to market was a leading paradigm for the PC's design team.
next reply other threads:[~2021-04-07 8:21 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-04-07 8:20 Paul Ruizendaal [this message] 2021-04-07 18:04 ` John Gilmore 2021-04-07 22:18 ` Thomas Paulsen 2021-04-07 22:40 ` Larry McVoy 2021-04-07 23:04 ` Jon Steinhart -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2021-04-07 7:52 Paul Ruizendaal via TUHS 2021-04-07 15:57 ` heinz 2021-04-08 22:31 ` Warner Losh
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=2313BFBA-8795-497F-AD46-46CCFC0E6E6C@planet.nl \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
The Unix Heritage Society mailing list This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone: git clone --mirror https://inbox.vuxu.org/tuhs # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V1 tuhs tuhs/ https://inbox.vuxu.org/tuhs \ email@example.com public-inbox-index tuhs Example config snippet for mirrors. Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://inbox.vuxu.org/vuxu.archive.tuhs AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git