From: don@DonHopkins.com (Don Hopkins)
Subject: SGI Software Usability II (IRIX 5.1 memo)
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 15:43:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <25699284-0F7B-4AFD-B37E-F8606CF94678@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AC831F18-D52F-4C0F-9E31-E4C7CD3F4A1E@gmail.com>
When I was working at UniPress in New Jersey, we had an SGI Iris named pink on which we developed the 4Sight versions of NeWS Emacs (NeMACS).
Speaking of SGI leaks:
Those things are fucking heavy!
It was raining torrentially outside and the UniPress office started to flood, so we had to keep taking shelves down off the wall and wedging them underneath the Iris to jack it up above the water, as it kept getting deeper and deeper.
Ron will remember the emergency bailing technique MG and I developed of repeatedly filling the shop vac with water then flushing it down the toilet.
The Indigos were another story entirely: They couldn't touch the raw graphics performance of an Iris, since the rendering was all in software, but you could actually stuff one of them in the overhead compartment on an airplane!
And then there was the SGI Indy... They made up for being small on the outside, by being HUGE and BLOATED in the inside:
"Indy: an Indigo without the 'go'". -- Mark Hughes (?)
This legendary leaked SGI memo has become required reading for operating system and programming language design courses:
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~cs415/reading/irix-bloat.txt <http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~cs415/reading/irix-bloat.txt>
-Don
> On 12 Oct 2017, at 15:16, Don Hopkins <SimHacker at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLDnPiXyME0 <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLDnPiXyME0>
>
>> On 12 Oct 2017, at 15:04, Michael-John Turner <mj at mjturner.net <mailto:mj at mjturner.net>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I came across this on Lobsters[1] today and thought it may be of interest to the list: http://www.art.net/~hopkins/Don/unix-haters/tirix/embarrassing-memo.html <http://www.art.net/~hopkins/Don/unix-haters/tirix/embarrassing-memo.html>
>>
>> It appears to be an internal SGI memo that's rather critical of IRIX 5.1. Does anyone know if it's true?
>>
>> [1] https://lobste.rs/ <https://lobste.rs/>
>>
>> Cheers, MJ --
>> Michael-John Turner * mj at mjturner.net <mailto:mj at mjturner.net> * http://mjturner.net/ <http://mjturner.net/>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20171012/d055e643/attachment-0001.html>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-12 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-12 13:04 Michael-John Turner
[not found] ` <AC831F18-D52F-4C0F-9E31-E4C7CD3F4A1E@gmail.com>
2017-10-12 13:43 ` Don Hopkins [this message]
2017-10-12 14:00 ` Larry McVoy
2017-10-12 14:16 ` Don Hopkins
2017-10-12 14:55 ` Don Hopkins
2017-10-12 14:59 ` Larry McVoy
2017-10-12 15:09 ` Don Hopkins
2017-10-12 15:20 ` Don Hopkins
2017-10-12 14:22 ` AT&T taking over Sun: Panic! Don Hopkins
2017-10-13 15:59 ` SGI Software Usability II (IRIX 5.1 memo) Jose R. Valverde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=25699284-0F7B-4AFD-B37E-F8606CF94678@gmail.com \
--to=don@donhopkins.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).