From: Yeechang Lee <ylee@columbia.edu>
To: tuhs@tuhs.org
Subject: [TUHS] Re: Documentation (was On Bloat and the Idea of Small Specialized Tools)
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 11:38:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <26187.39054.137077.761468@dobie-old.ylee.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABH=_VQU1hQ0FhxWg8ZC=U0VTG0gZQuQKzyn13DCdJwEKvRz2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Paul Winalski says:
> Sometimes in the process of doing that youd stop and think, "wait a
> minute--we don't really want it doing that". Or you'd find that you
> bhad difficulty articulating exactly how a particular feature
> behaves. That's a red flag that you've designed the feature to be
> too obscure and complex, or that there's something flat-out wrong
> with it.
My understanding is that an unexpected result of the requirement to draft all federal laws in Canada in both English and French is something similar: The discussion process ensuring that a bill's meaning is identical in both languages helps rid the text of ambiguities and errors regardless of language.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-20 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-18 18:07 [TUHS] Re: On Bloat and the Idea of Small Specialized Tools Douglas McIlroy
2024-05-18 18:13 ` Brantley Coile
2024-05-18 18:18 ` Larry McVoy
2024-05-18 18:52 ` Clem Cole
2024-05-18 19:19 ` Luther Johnson
2024-05-18 20:12 ` segaloco via TUHS
2024-05-18 19:32 ` Stuff Received
2024-05-18 18:22 ` Ralph Corderoy
2024-05-19 8:58 ` [TUHS] The 'usage: ...' message. (Was: On Bloat...) Ralph Corderoy
2024-05-18 18:31 ` [TUHS] Re: On Bloat and the Idea of Small Specialized Tools Peter Weinberger (温博格) via TUHS
2024-05-18 20:33 ` Steffen Nurpmeso
2024-05-19 8:39 ` Marc Rochkind
2024-05-20 6:07 ` Adam Thornton
2024-05-20 15:43 ` [TUHS] Documentation (was On Bloat and the Idea of Small Specialized Tools) Paul Winalski
2024-05-20 16:37 ` [TUHS] " Andrew Hume
2024-05-20 18:38 ` Yeechang Lee [this message]
2024-05-20 19:27 ` Phil Budne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=26187.39054.137077.761468@dobie-old.ylee.org \
--to=ylee@columbia.edu \
--cc=tuhs@tuhs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).