Re: [TUHS] Traditional method of dealing with embedded shar files

[Will Senn <will.senn@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1328 bytes --]

On 7/24/20 1:57 PM, Clem Cole wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 2:47 PM Will Senn <will.senn@gmail.com 
> <mailto:will.senn@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>>     I'm just getting comfortable using sed, thanks for the
>>     simplification.
>
> The issue with sed is that different shar programs used different 
> cut/here markers. Using vi was safer and as I said, since you did not 
> do it everyday, it was no big deal.
> Maybe since you have a number of these you want to apply, check with a 
> grep for the expected marker before you try to apply the sed script 
> and only do it in a more automated matter catching the vast majority 
> of the markers.]
>
> You asked how we did it.  As was said, there were a number of 
> unshar(1) commands out there, that did the sed for you.  Go looking in 
> the archives, but generally speaking using vi was 'good enough' for 
> day to day work because you did not run it that often / every day / 
> were >>usually<< not apply a lot of them in a row.
>
> Clem
Yup, I was curious what it looked like in the day. After hearing from 
everybody, I will use vi the first time and if I have to do it a bunch 
of ties, will test a sed script... or just wait 'til Warner's done and 
just check it from source code :).

Will

-- 
GPG Fingerprint: 68F4 B3BD 1730 555A 4462  7D45 3EAA 5B6D A982 BAAF


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3590 bytes --]