From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wes.parish@paradise.net.nz (Wesley Parish) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 19:51:23 +1200 Subject: [TUHS] Caldera ancient UNIX license question In-Reply-To: <5782C16A7C920E469B74E11B5608B8E7221C112E@Kriegler.ntdom.cupdx> References: <55920.20.132.68.148.1344631668.squirrel@webmail.tuffmail.net> <5782C16A7C920E469B74E11B5608B8E7221C112E@Kriegler.ntdom.cupdx> Message-ID: <2BB6CF27-48A2-4D8D-B44B-3CDBD8BA2C48@paradise.net.nz> Perhaps they'd listen to a petition? It worked before. On 11/08/2012, at 9:42 AM, Benjamin Huntsman wrote: > Now if we could just get Novell to extend the license to cover the > rest of the Research UNIXes, like 8th, 9th, and 10th Editions, > before the bits rot out of existence... > I made some inquiries a while back, and basically got the > impression that they didn't care, and hence didn't care enough to > expend legal effort to extend the license. > > Might still worth be asking around about though... > > > ________________________________________ > From: tuhs-bounces at minnie.tuhs.org [tuhs-bounces at minnie.tuhs.org] > on behalf of ron at ronnatalie.com [ron at ronnatalie.com] > Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 1:47 PM > To: tuhs at minnie.tuhs.org > Subject: Re: [TUHS] Caldera ancient UNIX license question > > I can't tell you the status of the agreements, but Novell has > pretty much stated after they are NOT interested in suing anybody > about Linux and that there is "no UNIX in Linux." > > _______________________________________________ > TUHS mailing list > TUHS at minnie.tuhs.org > https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs