From: Toby Thain <toby@telegraphics.com.au>
To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org
Subject: Re: [TUHS] Women in computing
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 17:22:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33ce5850-f0b5-1fa9-d459-58d4e2416e80@telegraphics.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201902142037.x1EKbpnR017241@darkstar.fourwinds.com>
On 2019-02-14 3:37 PM, Jon Steinhart wrote:
> Deborah Scherrer writes:
>> There have been several studies. As I remember, girls in school do
>> indeed receive as much encouragement in computers as do males. And
>> girls do indeed have access to as many resources as males. So the
>> studies came to no conclusions.
>>
>> My personal thought is that, in high school, it's the "nerd" factor. If
>> I were back in high school and saw the kind of guys that are getting
>> into computers now, I would stay a thousand miles away from them and
>> that field. But, alas, I don't think anyone has tried to research that
>> idea...
>>
>> And/or: I have a friend who was a professor of CS in Amsterdam. She had
>> many grad students of both sexes. She says she had to practically force
>> the women to stay in the field. They would see the guys getting overly
>> focused on the computer details themselves, completely overlooking the
>> goals of the project. The women would get frustrated and complain to
>> the professor. She would have to convince them that the guys just did
>> that, and that the women should stay on track.
>>
>> I do admit, I have a husband who does that. Personally, I have ALWAYS
>> looked at computers as a tool to accomplish something grander than just
>> being a computer. But I am usually out-shouted. ;-)
>
> I think that many of us old folk on this list started out in a time when
> getting a computer to be a computer was an accomplishment. But I agree
> that enough of that has been done that using computers as tools subservient
> to larger goals is where the bulk of the work exists today.
>
> There's a theory that sounds superficially plausible to me, which is that
> women leave the field because they're more responsible than men. The theory
I was REALLY hoping gender essentialism wouldn't be enlisted in this
thread. Oh well.
> is that women think more about whether a profession will provide them with
> the security and stability necessary to support a family. ...
>
> Jon
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-14 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-14 19:29 Noel Chiappa
2019-02-14 19:47 ` Seth Morabito
2019-02-14 20:02 ` Deborah Scherrer
2019-02-14 20:30 ` Larry McVoy
2019-02-14 20:37 ` Jon Steinhart
2019-02-14 22:22 ` Toby Thain [this message]
2019-02-14 22:37 ` Deborah Scherrer
2019-02-14 23:35 ` Andy Kosela
2019-02-14 23:45 ` Thomas Kellar
2019-02-14 23:46 ` Deborah Scherrer
2019-02-14 23:52 ` Jon Steinhart
2019-02-14 23:40 ` Larry McVoy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-02-14 13:14 John P. Linderman
2019-02-14 14:02 ` Finn O'Leary
2019-02-14 18:51 ` Deborah Scherrer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=33ce5850-f0b5-1fa9-d459-58d4e2416e80@telegraphics.com.au \
--to=toby@telegraphics.com.au \
--cc=tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).