From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: chd_1@nktelco.net (Chuck Dickman)
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 22:40:55 -0400
Subject: [pups] bsd2.11 kernel compile
References: <3D0E81C0.9046BF5D@bellsouth.net>
Message-ID: <3D0E9DB7.988203A@nktelco.net>

joseph lang wrote:
> When compiling a new kernel (to include network) I get an error
> 
> ld: too big for type 431
> *** exit 2
> 
> I assume this error is due to one of the overlays being too
> large. (this is pointed out in the install docs)

During the compile 'size' outputs a list of the sizes of the
overlays. Look at the output. For mine....

# size unix	! the OS kernel                                           
text    data    bss     dec     hex
55296   6492    20738   82526   1425e   total text: 106752
	overlays: 7744,7360,7872,7296,3072,7680,4864,5568
# size netnix	! the network code
text    data    bss     dec     hex
60864   2362    38448   101674  18d2a
                       
 
> How do I figure out which overlay (or base) is the problem?

The base must be less than 7 8k pages or 57344(decimal) bytes.
Each overlay must be less than 8k bytes or 8192(decimal).
The network code is not overlayed, so you have 8 pages or the
full 64k. 

> Is there a more scientific way to arrange the overlays?

To make it work, just get the sizes below the limits. The 
optimal arrangement would be placing the code in such that
the overlay changes were minimized. So... move your system
disk drivers into base and change the configuration to
remove any hardware you don't actually have. 

> Am I missing something obvious?

No, it just requires some tweeking.....

> joe lang

Good luck,

-chuck