From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: krewat@kilonet.net (Arthur Krewat)
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 18:14:19 -0500
Subject: [TUHS] Help request: uucp, mail on 4.2BSD
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1703080936320.2854@aneurin.horsfall.org>
References: <20170307070941.GA2012@minnie.tuhs.org>
 <20170307090908.GA9793@minnie.tuhs.org>
 <20170307204307.GA23160@minnie.tuhs.org>
 <alpine.BSF.2.20.1703080936320.2854@aneurin.horsfall.org>
Message-ID: <3ccb9249-86e5-6e11-8c67-dfaadcfcd359@kilonet.net>

Why do all these mail binaries on SVR4 x86 have "kremvax" hard coded 
into them?

/usr/lib/mail/surrcmd/smtpqer kremvax
/usr/lib/mail/surrcmd/tosmtp kremvax
/usr/lib/mail/surrcmd/smtpd kremvax
/usr/lib/mail/surrcmd/smtp kremvax


On 3/7/2017 5:38 PM, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Warren Toomey wrote:
>
>> It should be easy to generate systems and their connections from a
>> template. I'll write the scripts soon. I might call for participation in
>> a uucp/Usenet reconstruction with people running simulated nodes on the
>> Internet.
> Sounds like fun; would this be dialup for authenticity, or TCP for the
> modem-less?
>
>> Mail me your "dibs" for specific nodes. Who wants kremvax?  :-)
> Or kgbvax, moscvax, ciavax, nsavax...
>