From: vasco@icpnet.pl (Andrzej Popielewicz)
Subject: [TUHS] Borland's C++ BuilderX, Personal Edition
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 21:50:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42DEAB1D.1020403@icpnet.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.61.0507200717410.21772@malasada.lava.net>
Uz.ytkownik Tim Newsham napisa?:
>> The same concerns multitasking, multithreading , shared libraries etc.
>
>
> V7 already multitasks.
OK, so problem is solved.But I suspect it multitasks differently on
different hardware, unless You use existing V7 x86 implementation. I do
not know pdp architecture, I suspect it does differ from x86, I mean
TSS,GDT, TR etc.
> Why would you want shared libraries!?
Not me, but others, and possibly James himself, he wanted to make V7 top
modern.
> http://lava.net/~newsham/x/machine/more_v6.c
> http://lava.net/~newsham/x/machine/more_v7.c
Fine, I will try it out.I let You know if it works on Coherent.
I have already began to port more, but to finish I need to port termcap
first.
>> "vi". Editing with "cat" is possible but not very useful. I am not going
>> to learn "ed".
>
> Why?
Simply because. Because I do not like ed.
I want to have useful and user friendly system. To use ed, only because
it is the oldest editor, does not make any sense for me.
I appreciate ed, because of sed, because sed has some similarity to ed
and is extremely useful as a tool.
Unix is not about ed, Unix is about unlimited possibilities of adding
new software , new applications or new editors, it makes Unix beautiful
that it can develop and not editor ed.If ed were all Unix has, it would
not survive.
I hope You accept that someone else can have different favourite
editors. I prefer vi, or even more vim, which is perfect editor.Of
course in the case of emulator missing user friendly editor is not a
problem, because I can edit under Coherent and then build under
emulator.It is good to have a choice, and Unix offers it.
>> Did You try to port "vi" to Unix Version 7 system ? I can
>
> Why!?
As I said, because I like vi more than ed. Do You suggest , that James
should invest giant amount of time into porting V7 to x86/x64 and than
after use only one editor , namely ed ? As if it was prohibited to
develop another editor ?
> If one wanted an architecturally clean and modern V7-like system
> that ran on the PC they could always install Plan9. Of course if
> you're porting V7 for the educational experience, more power to you.
I do not know Plan9, but according to descriptions I have read, it looks
very interesting. Well it was developed by Bell Lab...(?)-AT/T, which
does not require recommendation.They offer also another interesting OS,
namely Inferno.
BTW, I am not porting it(V7), It is James , who wants to do it .So more
power to him.
I have enough fun with Coherent, it is according to wikipedia based on
Unix version 7 and is x86.
Andrzej
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-20 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-09 15:41 James Falknor
2005-07-10 20:21 ` Andrzej Popielewicz
2005-07-10 20:25 ` Wilko Bulte
2005-07-10 21:06 ` James Falknor
2005-07-19 22:13 ` Andrzej Popielewicz
2005-07-20 17:21 ` Tim Newsham
2005-07-20 19:50 ` Andrzej Popielewicz [this message]
2005-07-21 7:41 ` Wesley Parish
2005-07-21 8:35 ` Andrzej Popielewicz
2005-07-21 9:27 ` Andrzej Popielewicz
2005-07-21 11:44 ` Wesley Parish
2005-07-21 17:15 ` Gunnar Ritter
[not found] ` <20050721164429.60aa8811.jrvalverde@cnb.uam.es>
2005-07-21 19:45 ` Andrzej Popielewicz
2005-07-10 21:09 ` James Falknor
2005-07-10 21:11 ` James Falknor
2005-07-10 23:28 ` M. Warner Losh
2005-07-11 3:43 ` James Falknor
2005-07-11 4:11 ` M. Warner Losh
2005-07-22 7:37 ` Peter Jeremy
2005-07-20 21:17 Brantley Coile
2005-07-20 21:18 Brantley Coile
2005-07-21 0:35 James Falknor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42DEAB1D.1020403@icpnet.pl \
--to=vasco@icpnet.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).